Application of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan

A striking example of hypocrisy called the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry of Foreign Minister Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan, which he did when speaking on January 24 at the Foreign Relations of the European Parliament.

The commentary of the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry published on this occasion says that “the proposal of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia to resolve the situation around the Lachinsky road by military means a serious threat. The calls of Armenian leaders for the war are not new. Back in 2019, Armenian Prime Minister Nicholas Pashinyan said that “Karabakh is Armenia,” and the ex-minister of defense Tonoyan announced the “new war for new lands.” The proposal of the Minister of Foreign Affairs Mirzoyan about the military decision indicates that Armenia did not extract lessons from history and does not realize the consequences of 30- summer occupation of Azerbaijani territories. It is necessary to prevent this adventure of the Armenian side.

The fact that the European Union and other international organizations presented to Azerbaijan, as well as the parliaments, are irrefutable evidence (incomplete withdrawal of the Armed Forces of Armenia from the territories of Azerbaijan, the continuation of illegal activities in Azerbaijan, the abuse of the Lachinsky road and conducting the rotation of military personnel, preserving the mine threats in Azerbaijan , the illegal operation of natural resources, the creation of conditions for the illegal passage of third countries to the territory of Azerbaijan, etc.) gross violation of obligations taken by Armenia after the 2020 war, does not receive proper attention and conviction, gives the courage of the Armenian side. It becomes clear that the last performance of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia was inspired by incorrect, inciting revengeism by statements of some international circles on the situation around the Lachinsky road. “

The commentary of the Foreign Ministry indicates that “the fact that Armenia, which carried out … military aggression … against the international recognized territories of Azerbaijan, contrary to the norms and principles of international law that destroyed the cities and hundreds of villages, which carried out ethnic cleaning against Azerbaijani, who had expelled hundreds of thousands of people from their native lands, who did not fulfill 4 resolutions of the UN Security Council, refers to international law, appeals to international organizations and calls for intervention after the territories of Azerbaijan were exempted from the occupation. “