International Bank of Azerbaijan won court in Chelyabinsk, and “AgrarCredit” can not get 45 million

Chelyabinsk arbitration refused the Agrarcredit Azerbaijani Credit Organization in the acceleration of the process for consideration of the petition for the resolution of disagreements between LLC Club-Hotel “Yantar”, which owns the recreation in the Ural Lake Lake, and its creditors, reports haqqin.az with reference On the local edition of “True URFO”.

Before the resolution of this issue, “Agrarcredit” can receive about 45 million rubles, which made him from the sale of property of the ISTAR club-hotel LLC. The court recognized the debtor bankrupt in 2019, at the same time in the register of creditors entered “AgrarCredit” with the register of creditors The requirement of payment of 129.7 million rubles. The property complex of the base was laid in the credit institution. The property complex was implemented in March 2021 for half the price – 48.8 million at the starting value of 95.9 million rubles. The asset bought an individual entrepreneur from Chelyabinsk Tatyana Kozhevnikov.

We note that at the end of October of this year, the Chelyabinsk Oblsud supported the first instance and satisfied the requirement of 136.5 million rubles from Azerbaijani International Bank OJSC to Yantar Club Hotel, LLC “Trinity Motors” (recognized bankrupt ), LLC “Business Development Group” and Dmitry Cherkasov. As part of this proceedings, it is also allowed to draw a penalty for the collaborated property of the turbase.

In May, the Arbitration Manager “Amber” Maxim Sviltsov asked the court to resolve the differences between him and another lender – LLC “Job Offer” – about the distribution of funds reversed from the sale of funds. The manager proposed to send 362.6 thousand to compensate for spending on the implementation of the collateral, 1.2 million to repay the debt for the protection of property, another 267.6 thousand, he planned to give creditors to the second stage, and 2.4 million to send to the repayment of court expenses, including, on the remuneration of the finicultural. Also, shovers wanted to keep 0.3 million out of 44.7 million “agricultural buildings” “until the amount of the fine for the delay in the fulfillment of obligations to pay for the safety of collateral is reported in the court’s materials.