The head of the Armenian government of Nikol Pashinyan unveiled the final position of his state regarding the draft resolution “Zangezur Corridor”. Rejecting the idea of a transport corridor in Armenia, Pashinyan refers to the text of the Moscow Agreement of November 9. According to the Armenian premier, there is nothing about the corridor for Azerbaijan in Armenia in the text of the tripartite statement. Say, no in the 9th point of the agreement on November 9 of the desired word “corridor”. We are talking only about unhindered movement. Apparently, Pashinyan, as often repeated by Armenian opposition politicians, there are serious problems in thinking and ability to reasoning. And the logic of Pashinyan rejects the concept of “corridor”, that is, the unobstructed passage of the building or room, as well as through the territory of another state. The corridor is a transport transition, pass, and unobstructed and safe.
The same passage is provided by Azerbaijan and Russia according to the trilateral statement on the sovereign territory of Azerbaijan in the Lachinsky district. And Pashinyan appeals the fact that the term “Lachinsky Corridor” will be mentioned in the text of the statement, and in relation to Zangezura, the Corridor does not specify. It turns out that in this case, Azerbaijan, taking advantage of the game of Pashinyan, can limit the smooth movement through Lachin. Since the text of the trilateral agreement does not mention the unimpeded passage through the territory of Azerbaijan. Just says – “Lachin Corridor”. And according to Logic Pashinyan, Putin and Aliyev must appoint a philological examination in order to determine the semantic content of the term “corridor” and the absence of the term “unhindered passage”. Stupid? Yes. In Pashinian style? Almost yes!
Asks if Armenians living in the territory of Azerbaijan are freely enjoyed by a passage, that is, a corridor through the Azerbaijani district of Lachin, then why Azerbaijanis cannot take advantage of the corridor, that is, the unhindered passage through the territory of Armenia towards Nakhchivan autonomy?
If Pashinyan continues to engage in polytehemogogogo, and in its vulgar and vicious form, the negotiation process will be stalled, it will not be moved, especially in the issue of unlocking communications. The implementation of the “Zangezur Corridor” is responsible, first of all, the economic interests of Armenia itself. This corridor will not alleviate the situation of Nakhchivan at all, since Azerbaijan broke through the blockade of the autonomous region a few years ago with the help of Iran and its air corridors. In addition, Pashinyan forgets that Nakhchivan has a land border with Turkey and Iran.
The game of words may be expensive not only to Pashinyan, but also to the entire Armenian population, which uses Lachin as a corridor or a passage to Armenia. What happens to the Armenians in Azerbaijan in Azerbaijan if Azerbaijan revises the principles of the functioning of the Lachin pass?